Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the requirement that an amicus must be impartial “became outdated long ago”
• stating that the appellate court “would be well advised to grant motions for leave to file amicus briefs unless it is obvious that the proposed briefs do not meet Rule 29’s criteria as broadly interpreted”
• “A quick look at Supreme Court opinions discloses that corporations, unions, trade and professional associations, and other parties with 'pecuniary' interests appear regularly as amici.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).