Neno v. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a witness may not rely on information that someone else told him or her, but rather, must rely on personal observations
• explaining that a witness cannot indirectly incorporate hearsay into a statement of opinion or understanding
• addressing impropriety of having police officer offer his opinion on the cause of an accident based on the hearsay statements of witnesses testifying in the action
• \A lay witness's opinion cannot rely on the inadequate support of inadmissible hearsay without the benefit of an exception.\
• jury instruction as to “the proximate cause” was not erroneous where trial court instructed jury that there may be more than one proximate cause of an injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).