Nemitz v. Nemitz

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 306

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering modification of the parties' shared parenting time. The issue of whether Appellant was appropriately found in civil contempt for his failure to pay Appellee her portion of the equity in the marital home is moot because Appellant, in order to purge the contempt finding, has now paid Appellee her portion of the home's equity. The trial court did abuse its discretion by ordering Appellant to equally divide the balance of his 401(k) account without taking into consideration whether the account included any non-marital funds or whether he was entitled to an offset based upon Appellee's withdrawal of funds from her 401(k) account. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.