Nemir v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs who consented to tracking activity could 20 not state a claim under CIPA because the statute “imposes liability only for interception 21 ‘without the consent of all parties’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).