Nemec v. Morledge
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4752
Syllabus
Arbitration; motion to vacate; timely; filed; electronic filing; clerk of courts; authority to reject filing. Trial court erred in refusing to direct clerk of courts to accept for filing appellant's motion to vacate an arbitration award and to place the motion on active docket. There was no court rule or law authorizing the clerk of courts to reject a timely filed motion to vacate on the grounds that the wrong defendant was named in the case caption. Consequently, the trial court also erred in granting appellees' application to confirm the arbitration award where there is a timely filed motion to vacate the award pending before the court.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.