NEMEA HALL vs STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff power company did not have standing to sue because it would not suffer a \legal wrong\ as a consequence of a federally-supported power program likely to increase competition
• holding that plaintiff power company did not have standing to sue because it would not suffer a “legal wrong” as a consequence of a federally-supported power program likely to increase competition
• emphasizing the limits of § 702 as understood at the time of enactment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).