Skip to main content
· 3/26/1999

Nelson v. Progressive Corp.

Citations

  • 976 P.2d 859
  • 1999 Alas. LEXIS 41
  • 1999 WL 164089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that preponderance of evidence is standard of proof to establish that defendant engaged in knowing misrepresentation
  • applying abuse of discretion standard to trial court's exclusion of testimony where party violated court order by failing to give timely notice
  • \[A] litigant waives his right to 'challenge the consistency of a jury's verdict if he fails to raise the issue and move for resubmission prior to the jury's discharge.\
  • “[A] litigant waives his right to challenge the consistency of a jury’s verdict if he fails to raise the issue and move for resubmission prior to the jury’s discharge.”
  • testimony from plaintiff and his father that he was angry and “red in the face” after mishandling of insurance claim not severe emotional distress
  • plaintiff's evidence of emotional distress consisted only of testimony by plaintiff and his father

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.