Nelson v. Kentucky River Stone & Sand Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \a plaintiff may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion\
• refusing to consider defendant's liability based on a joint enterprise theory because plaintiff failed to plead such a theory and raised it for the first time in plaintiff's brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment
• refusing to consider defendant’s liability based on a joint enterprise theory because plaintiff failed to plead such a theory and raised it for the first time in plaintiff’s brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment
• analyzing an aiding and abetting claim unrecognized by the North Carolina Supreme Court by canvassing North Carolina Court of Appeals decisions applying and limiting liability for aiding and abetting or concert of action under the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 876 (1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).