Nelson v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that res judica-ta precludes relitigation by the same parties of relevant claims that could have been raised
• explaining that it is not necessary \to require tort actions between married persons to be litigated in the divorce proceeding\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-04-09· cited 129×
• Blake J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services Philip Kaufman John Does 1-10 and Alexa J.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2024-08-23· cited 65×
• McGee v. McGee
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-12· cited 40×
• Caudle v. Mendel
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 26×
• Larson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2011-06-10· cited 12×
• Weber v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-09-07· cited 12×
• Mogg v. National Bank of Alaska
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-02-12· cited 10×
• Gambini v. Hamilton
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2019-03-29· cited 3×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-17· cited 3×
• Richardson v. Richardson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-12-27
• Regina Sutton Chennault v. Michael Douglas Chennault
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2018-02-21