Idaho Supreme Court· 4/6/1984

Nelson v. Johnson

Citations

679 P.2d 662
106 Idaho 385
1984 Ida. LEXIS 460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[I]n case of doubt, the weight of authority holds that the easement should be presumed appurtenant.”
“[I]n case of doubt, the weight of authority holds that the easement should be presumed appurtenant.”
permission granted after the limitations period had elapsed did not defeat the claimant’s subsequent prescriptive easement claim
easement was appurtenant since it was “a beneficial and useful adjunct of the cattle ranch, and it would be of little use apart from the operations of the ranch”
easement was appurtenant since it was “a beneficial and useful adjunct of the cattle ranch, and it would be of little use apart from the operations of the ranch”
easement was appurtenant since it was “a beneficial and useful adjunct of the cattle ranch, and it would be of little use apart from the operations of the ranch”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huntley, Donaldson, Shepard, Bakes, Bistline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.