Skip to main content
· 3/22/1897

Nelson v. Flint

Citations

  • 166 U.S. 276
  • 17 S. Ct. 576
  • 41 L. Ed. 1002
  • 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2023

Syllabus

<p>On the face of the papers contained in the record, the right of the plaintiff below to recover is clear.</p> <p>Conversations between two makers of a note, in the absence of the payee. . and without his'knowledge, are not binding upon him, and áre not admissible in evidence against him in an action to recover on the note.</p> <p>A party cannot, by merely filing with the clerk an affidavit not incorporated in any bill of exceptions, bring into the record evidence of what took place at the trial.</p> <p>The errors alleged were frivolous, and the writ of error was sued out for delay, for which, in affirming the judgment, ten per cent damages are allowed under clause 2 of Eule 23.</p>

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.