Skip to main content
· 12/5/1996

Nelson v. Fleet National Bank

Citations

  • 949 F. Supp. 254
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19224
  • 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “it [was] fair to infer” that the defendant knew of the plaintiff’s employment agreement by virtue of being her “co-worker”
  • predicting that the Delaware Supreme Court would hold an action for tortious interference with contract may be maintained in conjunction with an at-will employment contract
  • holding allegations of discrimination could, but do not necessarily, support a finding that an agent was acting outside the scope of employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray M. Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.