Nelson v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether evidence established that defendant operated a motor vehicle within the meaning of a statutory prohibition is a mixed question of law and fact
• rejecting defendant’s challenge to proof he “operated” motor vehicle because “there was no burden on the Commonwealth to negate what ‘could have been’ or what was a ‘possibility’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).