· 5/28/1992
Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
Citations
- 794 F. Supp. 312
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7848
- 1992 WL 112166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court after analyzing section 85 in the same manner as in Tikkanen
- “the question of whether national banks may export terms other than periodic interest charges goes to the merits of the case; deciding that question on a motion to remand is inappropriate”
- \the question of whether national banks may export terms other than periodic interest charges goes to the merits of the case; deciding that question on a motion to remand is inappropriate\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacLAUGHLIN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.