Skip to main content
· 5/28/1992

Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.

Citations

  • 794 F. Supp. 312
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7848
  • 1992 WL 112166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court after analyzing section 85 in the same manner as in Tikkanen
  • “the question of whether national banks may export terms other than periodic interest charges goes to the merits of the case; deciding that question on a motion to remand is inappropriate”
  • \the question of whether national banks may export terms other than periodic interest charges goes to the merits of the case; deciding that question on a motion to remand is inappropriate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacLAUGHLIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.