Nelson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the evidentiary requirements for a claim of tortious interference with employment expectancy mirrors those for a tortious interference with business expectancy or economic advantage claim
• denying summary judgment against FMLA claim where the employee offered evidence that the justification for her termination was pretextual
• plaintiff created a genuine issue of fact regarding her FMLA claim by showing suspicious timing and providing some evidence that the justification for her termination was pretextual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).