Nelson v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that motion for judgment at close of all the evidence may incorporate by reference the arguments made in previous motion after close of plaintiff's case, and still satisfy particularity requirement of Rule 2-519(a)
• “A trial judge must be given a reasonable opportunity to consider all legal and evidentiary arguments in deciding what issues to submit to the jury and in framing proper instructions to the jury.” (quoting Kent Village v. Smith, 104 Md.App. 507, 517, 657 A.2d 330, 334 (1995))
• \A trial judge must be given a reasonable opportunity to consider all legal and evidentiary arguments in deciding what issues to submit to the jury and in framing proper instructions to the jury.\ (quoting Kent Village v. Smith, 104 Md.App. 507, 517, 657 A.2d 330, 334 (1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nelson v. Carroll
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-26· cited 63×
• Sage Title Group, LLC v. Roman
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-04· cited 23×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 15×
• Giant of Maryland, LLC v. Taylor
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-09-30· cited 3×
• Md Prop. Management v. Peters-Hawkins
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-01-28
• AXE Properties & Mgmt v. Merriman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-03-01
• AXE Properties & Mgmt v. Merriman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-24
• AXE Properties & Mgmt v. Merriman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-28

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• K & K Management, Inc. v. Chul Woo Lee
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-16· cited 144×
• Warfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-29· cited 76×
• Kendall v. Nationwide Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-21· cited 64×
• Franklin Square Hospital v. Laubach
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-14· cited 27×
• Saba v. Darling
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-07-03· cited 25×
• Kent Village Associates Joint Venture v. Smith
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-04-26· cited 23×
• Laubach v. Franklin Square Hospital
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-26· cited 20×
• Rockville Investment Corp. v. Rogan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-05-02· cited 17×
• Saba v. Darling
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-10-07· cited 16×
• Warfield v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-26· cited 10×
• Hickey v. Kendall
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-28· cited 10×
• Ford v. Tittsworth
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-12· cited 9×
• Wolfe Bros., Inc. v. FREDERICK CTY. NAT. BANK
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-02· cited 2×