Nelson v. Botts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs had not sufficiently plead deliberate indifference where the pleadings did not indicate that the funding recipient had failed to take appropriate remedial action upon gaining actual knowledge
• rejecting intentional discrimination claim where plaintiffs’ proffered statistics did not compare percentages to any baseline
• dismissing supervisory liability claims under Section 1983 where “there is no indication that they should have known that defendants under their supervision had violated plaintiffs’ rights.”
• dismissing claim where the plaintiffs failed to allege discriminatory intent “above the speculative level”
• “With regards to constitutional tort claims asserted against the City . . . the notice-of-claim requirement would apply absent an applicable exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).