Nelson v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that previous denial of summary judgment \decide[d] nothing except that under the evidence before the court at that time there can be rendered no judgment as a matter of law\
• recognizing BellSouth’s “less than precise” holding and instructing proper case “litigants to keep in mind that these ‘default cases’ often turn on a variety of factors (e.g., the trial court’s 11 discretionary judgment, factual subtleties
• claims of error relating to substantive merits of order granting summary judgment are deemed abandoned on appeal where appellant fails to address them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).