Nelson J. Mezerhane v. Republica Bolivariana De Venezuela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with Fifth Circuit that “injuries to individuals have been cognizable only where they implicate two or more different nations” (formatting altered)
• after limited analysis, the court dismissed a claim by a plaintiff who was alleged to be “de facto stateless” because the claim did not “implicate multiple states” as required by the law of takings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).