Skip to main content
· 2/2/1920

Nelms v. Pennsylvania R. R.

Citations

  • 268 Pa. 292
  • 109 A. 673
  • 1920 Pa. LEXIS 679

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Railroads — Movement of train — Injury to brakeman — Signal—Evidence—Presumption of negligence — Proximate cause.</p> <p>1. The mere fact of an injury will not raise a presumption of negligence on the part of a common carrier.</p> <p>2. In an action to recover damages for the death of a yard brakeman, who was run over and killed at night by a shifting train of cars, there can be no recovery where there was a lack of evidence to determine the proximate cause of the accident — whether deceased was struck by the engine or whether he fell on the track from which he gave a signal.</p>

Judges: Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Simpson, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.