Skip to main content
· 9/1/1998

Nelms v. Modisett

Citations

  • 153 F.3d 815
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21365
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff was chosen for termination because of departmental reorganization and a reduction in the role of field investigators and that the employee retained over the plaintiff had seniority and more exemplary work habits
  • in determining which of two employees to lay off, employer relied on duration of employment, performance, skills and professionalism

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.