Neimitz v. Conrad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant may directly appeal default judgment without moving to vacate under Rule 60(b)
• explaining that a defendant may directly appeal default judgment without moving to vacate under Rule 60(b)
• vacating a default judgment in large part because the defendant’s existing filings before the district court suggested a complete defense
• expressing this Circuit’s “clear preference . . . for cases to be adjudicated on the merits”
• examining three factors for setting aside a default judgment to determine whether district court properly granted a default judgment
• finding “unpersuasive” plaintiff’s argument that it has suffered prejudice where it had “incurred [] court costs and counsel fees” after “proceed[ing] to execute [a] default judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).