· 5/5/1930
Neiman-Marcus Co. v. Lucas
Citations
- 41 F.2d 300
- 59 App. D.C. 328
- 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 10858
- 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2774
- 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In this case, where there was no specific documentation submitted by claimant or SAIF on attorney fee hours, and the board offered an explanation for the amount of its award, the board’s explanation was adequate for judicial review and the attorney fee award is affirmed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.