Neil v. Cumberland County Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Wal-Mart employee was liable for actions taken during the course and scope of her employment because “[u]nlike the defendant in Leitch, [the employee] was personally involved in the conduct that allegedly contributed to [the plaintiff’s] injury”
• removing shampoo but leaving area unclean/unmarked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).