Neil Schleeper v. Michael Groose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal habeas courts need not consider arguments first raised in a reply brief
• “A federal court may not re-examine a state court’s interpretation and application of state law.”
• “A federal court may not re-examine a state court’s interpretation and application of state law.”
• \A federal court may not re- examine a state court's interpretation and application of state law.\
• \A federal court may not re-examine a state court's interpretation and application of state law.\
• a federal court may not re-examine a state court’s interpretation and application of state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).