Skip to main content
· 5/13/1992

NEIL S. SULLIVAN v. Medco

Citations

  • 607 A.2d 1386
  • 257 N.J. Super. 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying upon the “explicit” language of RPC 4.2, court permitted the attorney for the plaintiff to conduct an ex parte interview with a former employee of a corporate defendant
  • counsel must abide by Rule 4.3 guidelines — must disclose role in litigation and can not elicit any privileged information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.