Skip to main content
· 1/10/2006

Neil Humphrey v. Carolyn Elizabeth Humphrey, Neil Humphrey v. Carolyn Elizabeth Humphrey, Neil Humphrey v. Carolyn Elizabeth Humphrey

Citations

  • 434 F.3d 243
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that remand is appropriate when the record permits more than one resolution of a factual issue
  • noting that remand is appropriate when the record permits more than one resolution of a factual issue
  • noting that remand is appropriate when the record permits more than one resolution of a factual issue
  • noting that remand is appropriate when the record permits more than one resolution of a factual issue
  • noting that remand is appropriate when the record permits more than one resolution of a factual issue
  • noting that remand is appropriate when the record permits more than one resolution of a factual issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz, King, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.