Skip to main content
· 12/30/1926

Neighbors v. Thistle Down Co.

Citations

  • 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that belt bucµles 'cast in precious metals--decorative in nature and used as jewelry is, principally for ornamentation' and cast from specially handcrafted molds are copyrightable
  • holding that decorative belt buckles could be copyrighted as separate objects sold not to hold up one’s pants
  • examining whether artistic features are \primary” and utilitarian features are \subsidiary”
  • finding sculptural element of belt buckle conceptually separable from utilitarian function
  • “The Copyright Office continually engages in the drawing of lines between that which may be and that which may not be copyrighted.”
  • applying test of conceptual separability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.