Skip to main content
· 12/27/2007

Neighbors for a Healthy Gold Fork v. Valley County

Citations

  • 176 P.3d 126
  • 145 Idaho 121
  • 2007 Ida. LEXIS 238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the petitioning organization had not demonstrated how mislabeled exhibits harmed it and could not show that the mislabeling deprived it of due process
  • considering the neighbors’ opportunity to present written evidence and objections at an earlier hearing, as well as written exhibits at the challenged hearing
  • considering the neighbors’ opportunity to present written evidence and objections at an earlier hearing, as well as written exhibits at the challenged hearing
  • “Procedural due process requires some process to ensure that the individual is not arbitrarily deprived of his or her rights in violation of the state or federal constitutions.”
  • “Procedural due process requires some process to ensure that the individual is not arbitrarily deprived of his or her rights in violation of the state or federal constitutions.”
  • “review on appeal is limited to those issues raised before the lower tribunal and that an appellate court will not decide issues presented for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.