· 12/27/2007
Neighbors for a Healthy Gold Fork v. Valley County
Citations
- 176 P.3d 126
- 145 Idaho 121
- 2007 Ida. LEXIS 238
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the petitioning organization had not demonstrated how mislabeled exhibits harmed it and could not show that the mislabeling deprived it of due process
- considering the neighbors’ opportunity to present written evidence and objections at an earlier hearing, as well as written exhibits at the challenged hearing
- considering the neighbors’ opportunity to present written evidence and objections at an earlier hearing, as well as written exhibits at the challenged hearing
- “Procedural due process requires some process to ensure that the individual is not arbitrarily deprived of his or her rights in violation of the state or federal constitutions.”
- “Procedural due process requires some process to ensure that the individual is not arbitrarily deprived of his or her rights in violation of the state or federal constitutions.”
- “review on appeal is limited to those issues raised before the lower tribunal and that an appellate court will not decide issues presented for the first time on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.