· 2/5/2016
Neighborhood Restore HDFC v. Wilson
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff’s “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity also were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
- holding that the plaintiffs “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity ... were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
- holding that a plaintiff’s “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity also were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
- holding that the plaintiff’s “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity . . . were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
- finding that a plaintiff's claims for “injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity ... were barred by the plain language .. . of § 1983”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.