Skip to main content
· 2/5/2016

Neighborhood Restore HDFC v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff’s “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity also were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
  • holding that the plaintiffs “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity ... were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
  • holding that a plaintiff’s “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity also were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
  • holding that the plaintiff’s “claims seeking injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity . . . were barred by the plain language of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
  • finding that a plaintiff's claims for “injunctive relief against a sitting state court judge for actions taken in his judicial capacity ... were barred by the plain language .. . of § 1983”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.