Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (Naca) v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering In re Sealed Case language on misconduct to be “dicta” and stating that “other than these general observations, our Court of Appeals has never squarely applied the exception”
• considering In re Sealed Case language on misconduct to be “dicta” and stating that “other than these general observations, our Court of Appeals has never squarely applied the exception”
• “But even assuming this approach was proper initially, it does not follow that, during the course of its review, HUD could then ignore indications that responsive documents were likely to be located elsewhere.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).