Nehring v. Ariyoshi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying strict scrutiny analysis since the durational residency requirement for public employment operated as penalty for newly arrived residents
• striking down a one-year residence requirement for public employment since “the denial of the opportunity to apply for public employment does have a sufficient enought impact upon the right to travel to require that the statute be justified by a compelling state interest”
• residency requirement for all public employment invalid; statute served no compelling state interest and had no rational basis
• the denial of the opportunity to apply for public employment does have a sufficient enough impact upon the right to travel to require that the statute be justified by a compelling state interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).