Nehrboss v. 600 Cayuga Rd., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that letters describing market conditions for domestic lumber companies “plainly contain commercial information within the meaning of Exemption 4”
• holding that requestor’s assertion that an adequate search would have yielded more documents is mere speculation insufficient to rebut affidavits describing search process agency performed
• holding that letters describing market conditions for domestic lumber companies \plainly contain commercial information within the meaning of Exemption 4\
• explaining that Exemption 4 “applies (among other situations) when the provider of the information has a commercial interest in the information submitted to the agency”
• explaining that FOIA “does not require that agencies account for all of their documents, so long as they reasonably attempt to locate them”
• explaining that requests for discovery generally “should be denied where an agency’s declarations are reasonably detailed, submitted in good faith[,] and the court is satisfied that no factual dispute remains”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).