· 10/15/2013
Negron v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 465
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 311
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3216
- 571 U.S. 969
- 2013 WL 4986140
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Petitioner] has offered no explanation for how he was able to file in [his state court] cases but not in this one.”
- “As our precedents make clear, an attorney’s misunderstanding or miscalculation of the AEDPA deadline alone does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance.”
- “As our precedents make clear, an attorney’s misunderstanding or miscalculation of the AEDPA deadline alone does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance.”
- attorney’s incorrect belief that deadline had been tolled was nothing other than an unfortunate mistake that did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance
- “Equitable tolling is an extraordinary remedy and so is rarely granted.”
- “Equitable tolling is an extraordinary remedy and so is rarely granted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.