Skip to main content
· 10/15/2013

Negron v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 465
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 311
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3216
  • 571 U.S. 969
  • 2013 WL 4986140
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Petitioner] has offered no explanation for how he was able to file in [his state court] cases but not in this one.”
  • “As our precedents make clear, an attorney’s misunderstanding or miscalculation of the AEDPA deadline alone does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance.”
  • “As our precedents make clear, an attorney’s misunderstanding or miscalculation of the AEDPA deadline alone does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance.”
  • attorney’s incorrect belief that deadline had been tolled was nothing other than an unfortunate mistake that did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance
  • “Equitable tolling is an extraordinary remedy and so is rarely granted.”
  • “Equitable tolling is an extraordinary remedy and so is rarely granted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.