Negretti v. Negretti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding because “we cannot fairly assess whether this was an abuse of discretion” where we could not “readily ascertain” the court’s reasoning
• remanding because “the trial court did not address [important] testimony or its effect (if any) on the court’s determination,” and when appellant highlighted that the testimony had gone unaddressed, the court still did not address it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Galbis v. Nadal
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-10· cited 20×
• Dews v. Dews
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-04· cited 14×
• Barnes v. Sherman
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-24· cited 10×
• Herron v. Johnson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-07-16· cited 7×
• Bernard v. Bernard
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-06-03· cited 2×
• Henny v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-08-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stansel v. American Security Bank
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-09-23· cited 45×
• Nelson v. Nelson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-06· cited 29×
• Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Adams
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-28· cited 22×
• Freeman v. Freeman
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-01-31· cited 18×
• Williams v. Ray
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-05· cited 17×
• Bowser v. Bowser
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 13×
• Wright v. Wright
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-19· cited 12×
• Hairston v. Hairston
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-12· cited 12×
• Roberson v. Roberson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-12-07· cited 9×