Skip to main content
· 3/9/1993

Negretti v. Negretti

Citations

  • 621 A.2d 388
  • 1993 WL 65755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding because “we cannot fairly assess whether this was an abuse of discretion” where we could not “readily ascertain” the court’s reasoning
  • remanding because “the trial court did not address [important] testimony or its effect (if any) on the court’s determination,” and when appellant highlighted that the testimony had gone unaddressed, the court still did not address it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Steadman, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.