Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of Commerce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court neither weighs the evidence nor substitutes its own judgment for that of the agency
• holding that the ITC is not required to, but may, incorporate lost sales allegations in analysis of lost sales
• holding ITC may, but is not required, to incorporate lost sales allegations in analysis of lost sales
• noting that court should not interfere with Commission’s discretion to interpret reasonably evidence collected in investigation
• upholding Commission finding, although it did not explicitly declare that volume of imports was significant, as agency’s path was reasonably discernible
• contrasting the IPRS at issue in Sawhill which does not require manufacturers to pay anything further on its export sales with the currency scheme under review which could require further payment on export

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).