Negbaur v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whether we should ... recog-niz[e] a remedy in tort is a question that is best resolved by reference to the relevant judicial- and social policy considerations.”
• “An employee’s entitlement to a bonus is governed by the terms of the employer’s bonus plan.”
• “[T]he injury arose not as a result of the injured’s reliance on negligently made statements but rather as a result of the direct impact that those statements had on the injured party’s business and personal life.”
• “At common law, ‘a corporation proposing to give a sum for the benefit of any person or any set of persons has the right to fix the terms of his bounty, and provide under what circumstances the gift shall become vested and absolute.’” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).