Neff v. Capital Acquisitions & Management Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because [the plaintiff’s] FDCPA claim is entirely predicated on a nonexistent TILA violation, [his] FDCPA claim must be dismissed.”
• “Because his FDCPA claim is entirely predicated on a nonexistent TILA violation, [plaintiff’s] FDCPA claim must be dismissed.”
• “[B]ecause defendants purchased delinquent accounts, 1.e., debt on which defendants charged interest, and extended no credit privileges of their own, defendants are ‘debt collectors’ subject to the FDCPA, not ‘creditors’ subject to TILA.”
• “[B]lecause defendants purchased delinquent accounts, 1.e., debt on which defendants charged interest, and extended no credit privileges of their own, defendants are ‘debt collectors’ subject to the FDCPA, not ‘creditors’ subject to TILA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).