Neergaard v. Neergaard Colon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the father “did not pursue permanent resident status for his family in Singapore
• noting lack of purchase of a home in Singapore as supporting a finding that the parents did not intent to abandon the United States
• explaining that simply finding “that the parents agreed that the children would be present in a particular place for a particular period of time that had yet to elapse” is not the same as finding a shared intent to abandon a prior habitual residence for a new one
• parties’ intent to reside in Singapore for a temporary period of three years weighed in favor of finding a lack of abandonment of the prior residency
• “In the event the parents disagree as to their children’s place of habitual residence, we look to the intent of the parents at the latest time that their intent was shared.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mauvais v. Herisse
  First Circuit· 2014-11-05· cited 156×
• Vieira v. De Souza
  First Circuit· 2022-01-07· cited 21×
• Johan Sebastian Alzat Calixto v. Hadylle Yusuf Lesmes
  Eleventh Circuit· 2018-11-30· cited 17×
• Mendez v. May
  First Circuit· 2015-02-13· cited 13×
• Sánchez-Londoño v. González
  First Circuit· 2014-06-10· cited 10×
• Mendez v. May
  D. Massachusetts· 2015-01-12· cited 4×
• German v. Lopez
  D. Massachusetts· 2015-11-19· cited 2×
• Sanchez Londono v. Gonzalez
  First Circuit· 2014-06-10
• Diaz-Alarcon v. Flandez-Marcel
  First Circuit· 2019-12-16

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abbott v. Abbott
  Supreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 506×
• In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal Mozes
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 276×
• Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-Feder
  Third Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 250×
• Yossi Gitter, in the Matter of Eden Moshe Gitter: Infant Under the Age of 16 v. Miriam Gitter
  Second Circuit· 2005-01-05· cited 152×
• Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-12-09· cited 112×
• Antonia P. Koch v. Dane J. Koch
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-06-13· cited 69×
• Asuncion Mota v. Rivera Castillo
  Second Circuit· 2012-08-15· cited 69×
• Darin v. Olivero-Huffman
  First Circuit· 2014-03-19· cited 46×
• Nicolson v. Pappalardo
  First Circuit· 2010-04-30· cited 44×
• Barzilay v. Barzilay
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-04-02· cited 43×
• McManus v. McManus
  D. Massachusetts· 2005-02-04· cited 22×