Neeley v. Kelsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failing to apply the presumption where a general description of all land north of a county road would encompass two parcels clearly owned by someone else
• \The specific description in chains and degrees prevails over the general reference [to the location of a boundary].\
• “The general rule is that parol evidence may not contradict, vary, or add to deeds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).