Neel v. Campton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendants’ “alleged misappropriation of [the plaintiff’s] loans” did not plead that the defendant entered one of plaintiff’s computers “without authorization” or in “excess of authorization”
• dismissing CFAA claim where allegations in complaint focused on defendants’ misappropriation of data rather than whether defendant inappropriately accessed a computer or exceeded their authority in accessing the data
• dismissing accounting claim as duplicative of breach of contract claim and because plaintiff has a sufficient legal remedy to obtain defendant’s financial records through discovery in the context of its breach of contract claim
• dismissing § 1030(a)(4) claim for failure to plead exceeding authorization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).