Nee v. Big Creek Partners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a directed verdict for the defendant, explaining that a jury could not be permitted to infer that steps were dangerous from merely examining photos
• affirming a directed 11 verdict for the defendant, explaining that a jury could not be permitted to infer that steps were dangerous from merely examining photos
• “If no dangerous or defective condition exists, an owner or occupier cannot be held liable for failing to take action in order to remedy the supposed condition.”
• “A finding that . . . steps were defective or dangerous based [solely] on . . . photographs would require . . . speculation, conjecture, and guesswork.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).