Skip to main content
· 10/21/1998

Nedved v. Welch

Citations

  • 585 N.W.2d 238
  • 1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 234
  • 1998 WL 733829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the motion “essentially moot” because the court denied the motion to extend “after the additional time requested had run”
  • stating “good cause” in section 668.11 “is a ‘sound, effective, truthful reason, something more than an excuse, a plea, apology, extenuation, or some justification for the resulting effect’” (citation omitted)
  • affirming the rejection of an expert designation filed three months late

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Neuman, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.