Nedrich v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for recovery under an implied contract was “not objectively reasonable” when the subject matter was defined by the terms of an express contract
• \examin[ing] the legal theories\ to determine if they were \warranted by existing law\
• “The law will not impose an implied contractual relationship upon parties in contravention of an express contract.”
• claim for bonus not objectively reasonable where right to receive bonus was defined by plain language
• law will not impose implied contractual relationship upon parties in contravention of express contract
• award of sanctions by trial court on eight of ten counts reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).