Nedra Scott v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, A/K/A Dillard's, A/K/A the Higbee Company, A/K/A Dillard's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “range of liberty interests” protected by substantive due process is “narrow.”
• “The Supreme Court has held that a driver's license can be 11 revoked without a pre-revocation hearing.”
• “The Supreme Court has held 13 that a driver's license can be revoked without a pre-revocation hearing.”
• no fundamental right to travel by airplane and identification or more extensive searches of airline passengers are reasonable
• “It is well-established that because due process is a flexible concept, ‘[p]recisely what procedures the Due Process Clause requires in any given case is a function of context.’”
• “The range of liberty interests that substantive due process protects is narrow and only those aspects of liberty that we as a society traditionally have protected as fundamental are included within the substantive protection of the Due Process Clause.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).