Nedlloyd Lines, B v. Corp. v. Harris Transport Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that two letters submitted by the shipper were inadequate as claims because they failed to include damage estimates
• “[p]ermitting an inadequate claim to toll the statute of limitations for the filing of suit would frustrate the regulatory purpose of encouraging voluntary settlement”
• agreeing with Second Circuit that compliance with ICC notice provisions “is an essential prerequisite to recovery in an action at law.”
• excusing the failure to specify an amount of damages in certain situations
• carrier’s denial of liability for claim does not excuse timely filing of adequate notice of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).