· 10/7/2013
Nedelcu v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 157
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 110
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3182
- 571 U.S. 863
- 2013 WL 2618440
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a motion for leave to amend “should generally be granted in light of ‘this Circuit’s policy to liberally allow amendment’” (quoting Galustian v. Peter, 591 F.3d 724, 729 (4th Cir. 2010))
- stating that “the nature of dismissal” is left to “the sound discretion of the district court”
- stating that “the nature of dismissal” is left to “the sound discretion of the district court”
- stating that “the nature of dismissal” is left to “the sound discretion of the district court”
- stating that “the nature of dismissal” is left to “the sound discretion of the district court”
- stating that “the nature of dismissal” is left to “the sound discretion of the district court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.