Nedds v. Calderon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing a habeas petitioner’s equitable tolling argument on one ground as a request for the expansion of a certificate of appealability that was granted on a different equitable tolling ground
• “[A] California habeas petitioner who unreasonably delays in filing a state habeas petition 1 is not entitled to the benefit of statutory tolling during the gap or interval preceding the filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).