Skip to main content
· 1/6/1976

NEDA Construction Co. v. Jenkins

Citations

  • 223 S.E.2d 732
  • 137 Ga. App. 344
  • 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cost to repair historic home allowed even though such cost exceeded home’s market value by approximately twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00)
  • cost to repair historic home allowed even though such cost exceeded home’s market value by approximately $25,000.00
  • despite suggestion that fair market value was less than repair cost, repair costs were appropriate when notable and valuable historic home was damaged and there was no evidence that the home was dilapidated
  • despite suggestion that fair market value was less than repair cost, repair costs were appropriate when notable and valuable historic home was damaged and there was no evidence that the home was dilapidated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, Bell, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.