Ned Chartering & Trading, Inc. v. Republic of Pakistan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that, “because ‘attorneys are not clairvoyant,’ [defendant] could not foresee the discovery it would need until it saw [plaintiff’s] summary judg- ment motion”
• court not required to unearth theories and precedents not cited by the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).